Everything one address did, in one place.
A wallet profile collects activity, counterparties, exposure, attribution, evidence and investigation status behind a single address — so an analyst stops assembling the same picture by hand for the fourth time.
What is crypto wallet intelligence?
Wallet intelligence collects everything one address has done into a single view: balances, counterparties, exposure, clustering and behaviour over time. Two addresses are treated as one wallet only where a stated heuristic supports it. CoinJoin and similar privacy constructions defeat those heuristics, and the platform reports that rather than guessing.
Eight tabs on one wallet.
Overview
Identity of the address on-chain: network, first and last activity, balance history and current status.
Transactions
Every observed transfer, filterable by asset, direction, value and counterparty category.
Fund flow
The directed graph out of and into this address, expandable hop by hop.
Counterparties
Who this address transacts with, ranked by value and frequency, with each counterparty's own risk.
Risk
The score, its decomposition and its history — including what moved it and when.
Exposure
Direct and indirect exposure by category, with the hop limit stated on every figure.
Evidence
Artefacts attached to this address within a case: exports, screenshots, correspondence.
Notes
Investigator notes, timestamped and attributed, kept separate from asserted fact.
When two addresses are treated as one wallet.
Clustering is a heuristic, not a fact. The platform records which heuristic produced each grouping so a reviewer can weigh it.
| Heuristic | Applies to | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Common input ownership | Bitcoin and other UTXO chains | Strong where inputs are genuinely co-spent; weakened by CoinJoin and similar constructions. |
| Change address detection | UTXO chains | Moderate. Heuristic by nature and explicitly flagged as such. |
| Deposit address reuse | Account chains | Strong where a service assigns per-customer deposit addresses. |
| Behavioural co-occurrence | All chains | Weak on its own. Used to raise a hypothesis, never to assert a link. |
A cluster in this platform is never presented as a fact about ownership. It is presented as a grouping produced by a named heuristic, with the confidence that heuristic carries.
Not from the chain alone. Public ledgers record addresses, not people. Where an address belongs to a service that identifies its customers, that service — not us — holds the identity, and obtaining it is a legal process rather than an analytical one.
It means exactly what it says: no source and evidence trail exists that would justify naming an entity. We would rather show 'unattributed' than a plausible guess that ends up in a filing.
Yes. Continued monitoring is one of the documented next steps at the end of a case, and it is often the most useful one when funds are sitting still.