The blockchain half of a matter you already own.
Corporate investigators, private investigators and internal investigation functions usually own the wider matter. What they need is the on-chain component done properly and documented so it fits their file.
Blockchain analysis for professional investigators
Professional investigators use ChainwatchCrypto for the blockchain half of a matter they already own: fund-flow reconstruction, attribution with stated confidence, and evidence formatted for a file that somebody else will scrutinise. The analysis supports an investigation rather than replacing the investigator’s own judgement.
What you are actually trying to establish.
What we bring to it
Investigator workspace. Graph, timeline, evidence and notes in one place, with every action recorded.
Exports. CSV and JSON of traced paths, with the query that produced them attached.
Working record. Notes and hypotheses retained separately from asserted findings.
Monitoring. Watch the addresses in your matter and be told when something moves.
The shape of a typical engagement.
Brief
What the wider matter needs from the on-chain component.
Access
Workspace access scoped to the case, with role-based permissions.
Analysis
Tracing, clustering and attribution, with confidence recorded throughout.
Working review
Findings discussed against the evidence before anything is finalised.
Deliverable
Report and exports in the form your file needs.
Monitoring
Continued watch on relevant addresses where that is useful.
What this will not do for you.
Every page on this site states its limits. If a vendor will not write this section for their own product, that absence is itself information.
Yes, under an engagement, scoped to the case with role-based permissions. Every action in the workspace is written to the audit record, including ours.
Yes, and they stay separate from asserted findings. A working note is a hypothesis with a timestamp; conflating that with a finding is how investigations go wrong.