ChainwatchCrypto—blockchain intelligence and investigative operationsAll systems operational
Solutions for Exchanges

Screening, monitoring, and a process for the reports that arrive.

Exchanges sit at the point where traced funds stop being an abstraction. That means screening obligations on one side and a steady flow of third-party reports on the other.

KYT and KYB toolingSigned webhooksAudit-ready records

Blockchain compliance for crypto exchanges

Exchanges use ChainwatchCrypto for deposit and withdrawal screening, continuous monitoring, and a defined process for handling the theft reports they receive. Screening produces exposure findings and an audit record. Whether to freeze an account remains the exchange’s decision and its legal responsibility, not the vendor’s.

The question

What you are actually trying to establish.

Deposit and withdrawal screening against your own policy
Monitoring that produces a reviewable alert rather than noise
A defensible record of every screening decision
A consistent way to assess incoming third-party trace reports
Integration into systems you already run, not another portal

What we bring to it

KYT screening. Evaluate deposits and withdrawals against configurable policy, with the policy version recorded on every result.

Monitoring. Rules you define, alerts that carry their triggering rule and evidence, and suppression you can tune.

API and webhooks. Scoped keys, signed webhook delivery with retries and idempotency keys.

Report assessment. An evidence standard for judging third-party trace reports, so incoming claims are handled consistently.

How it runs

The shape of a typical engagement.

01

Policy mapping

Your thresholds, categories, hop limits and jurisdictional variations.

02

Integration

API keys, environments, IP restrictions and webhook endpoints.

03

Pilot

Run in parallel with your existing process and compare outcomes before switching.

04

Tuning

Adjust thresholds against the alert volume your team can genuinely review.

05

Production

Full screening and monitoring with audit records retained to your policy.

06

Review

Periodic model and rule review, with versioning so history stays reproducible.

Limits

What this will not do for you.

This is compliance tooling; it does not constitute a compliance programme
We do not determine your obligations in any jurisdiction
A screening result is not a legal determination about any customer
We do not certify, licence or approve any organisation
Said plainly, on purpose

Every page on this site states its limits. If a vendor will not write this section for their own product, that absence is itself information.

Yes, under a platform agreement. Every score records the model version applied, so changing policy going forward never silently rewrites the basis of past decisions.

Identifier matching is always surfaced as requiring human review, never as a determination. The match basis is recorded so a reviewer can see exactly what matched what.

Let us look at your situation.

A case assessment costs nothing and ends with a straight answer about what is possible.