Periodic reporting, with the method attached.
Longer-form reports on what we can actually evidence across the casework and monitoring we run. Each report states its data basis, its method and its limits before it states a conclusion.
ChainwatchCrypto intelligence reports
ChainwatchCrypto publishes the structure of its periodic intelligence reporting in advance of the first report, so readers can judge the method before any findings exist. No report has been published yet, and the page states that plainly rather than implying a back catalogue that does not exist.
The first report is not published yet.
A periodic intelligence report is only worth reading if the figures in it are derived from a disclosed basis. Publishing one before that basis exists would mean inventing the numbers, which is the specific thing this platform will not do.
When the first report is published it will state the data it draws on, the period it covers, how each figure was derived, and what it does not support. Until then, this page says so rather than filling the space.
Ask to be notifiedThe structure, published in advance.
| Section | Contents |
|---|---|
| Scope and period | What is covered and over what window. |
| Data basis | Which data the figures are derived from, and its known gaps. |
| Method | How each figure was calculated, in enough detail to be reproduced. |
| Findings | Typed as fact, analytical interpretation or unverified information. |
| Limitations | What the data cannot support, written before the findings. |
| Revision history | Corrections issued as new versions, with the previous retained. |
A resources section with a placeholder report is a marketing decision. A resources section that says the report does not exist yet is an accuracy decision. We would rather look sparse than look invented.